Tom Petty was recently rewarded royalties for similarities between his hit "Won't Back Down" and Sam Smith's single "Stay With Me." Now, Rolling Stone has published an article in support of compensation for songwriters.
According to the U.S. Copyright Office, "Our music-licensing system is in need of repair."
I, however, disagree. Sure, with apps like Pandora and Spotify, it's difficult for musicians to optimize their profits. But that's not the point of making music. The point is for it to be heard.
Dave Grohl of the Foo Fighters once said, "My songwriting is like extending a hand to the listener."
The way listeners obtain a musician's art shouldn't matter. If they like what they hear, they're going to be willing to buy the merchandise and concert tickets.
I am wondering what your belief is based on, I mean why do you think songs must be distributed for free. Are albums and merchandise & tickets different products?
ReplyDeleteIf musicians do not want free circulation of their music, should they be protected?